Clinical Medical Students’ Preferred Teaching Methods: A Study at the National Defense University of Malaysia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Sheikh Salahuddin Ahmed

  •   Sagili Chandrasekhara Reddy

Abstract

Background: Providing appropriate teachings in the curriculum have a great impact on learning by the students.


Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical undergraduate medical students’ preferred teaching methods provided by the medical educators.


Material and Methods: This study was conducted on 89 medical students in the 4th and 5th year of the Faculty of Medicine and Defense Health, National Defense University of Malaysia, from 1st November 2019 to 31st July 2020. Each of the students was approached with a structured questionnaire for their responses to determine their preferred teaching methods.


Results: Out of 89 students, 46 were male (51.7%); the mean age of the study students was 23.5 years. Among the various teaching methods, bedside teaching was the most preferred (76.4%) one followed by lectures (14.6%), tutorials (7.9%) and seminars (1.1%). 66.3% of students would use e-learnings’ uploaded teaching materials, whereas the remainder would not. Bedside demonstrations of clinical skills by the tutors were preferred by 77.5% of students. Practicing clinical skills by the students on a real patient rather than on a mannequin or a simulated patient was preferred by 94.4% of students. Regarding case discussions, problem-based learnings (PBL) were preferred by 80% of students.


Conclusions: Bedside teachings, demonstrations of clinical skill by a teacher, practicing skills by the students on a real patient rather than on a simulated patient or a mannequin, and PBLs are highly preferred by the students. Adequate teaching materials uploaded in the e-learning management system provide a good source for the teachings and learnings.


Keywords: Teaching methods, medical educators, teaching preference; clinical medical students; medical education

References

Papanna KM, Kulkarni V, Tanvi D, Lakshmi V, Kriti L, Unnikrishnan B, et al. Perceptions and preferences of medical students regarding teaching methods in a Medical College, Mangalore India. Afr Health Sci. 2013;13(3):808-13.

Salam A, Siraj HH, Mohamad N, Das S, Rabeya Y. Bedside Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: Issues, Strategies, and New Models for Better Preparation of New Generation Doctors. Iran J Med Sci. 2011 Mar; 36(1):1–6.

Barrows HS, Abrahamson S. The programmed patient: a technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. J Med Educ 1964;39:802–5.

Stillman PL, Regan MB, Philbin M, Haley HL. Results of a survey on the use of standardised patients to teach and evaluate clinical skills. Acad Med 1990;65:288–92.

Schwartzstein RM, Roberts DH. Saying Goodbye to Lectures in Medical School — Paradigm Shift or Passing Fad? Perspective. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(7):605-607.

Gwee MCE. Commentary in “Medical Education: Issues, Trends, Challenges & Opportunities”. SMA News. 2003(35(2):5-8.

Charlton BG (Editor in Chief). Lectures are such an effective teaching method because they exploit evolved human psychology to improve learning. Medical Hypotheses. 2006;67(6):1261-1265.

Ismail S, Rahman NIA, Mohamad N, Jusoh NM, Hood AIB, Arif LAB. Preference of Teaching and Learning Methods in a new Medical School of Malaysia. J App Pharm Sci. 2014;4(02):048-055.

Dacre JE, Fox RA. How should we be teaching our undergraduates? Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2000;59(9):662–667.

Seifer SD. Recent and emerging trends in undergraduate medical education-curricular responses to a rapidly changing health care system. West j Med. 1998;168:400-411.

Zeng HL, Chen DX, Li Q, Wang XY. Effects of seminar teaching method versus lecture-based learning in medical education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Medical Teacher, 2020;42(12):1343-1349.

Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. The development of e-learning for doctors. 2007. Retrieved December 3, 2020, from http://www.aomrc.org.uk/news.aspx.

Dziuban CD, Hartman JL, Moskal PD. Blended Learning. Educause Research Bulletin.2004;7:2-12.

Hajar R. The Clinicopathologic Conference. Heart Views. 2015;16(4):170–173.

Harden RM. Trends and the future of postgraduate medical education. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(10):798–802.

Vyas R, Sathishkumar S. Recent Trends in Teaching and Learning in Physiology Education Early Clinical Exposure and Integration. International Journal of Basic and Applied Physiology. 2012;1(1):175-181.

Holambe VM, Thakur NA, Giri PA. Student’s preferences for learning in medical education. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2015;2(3):328-330.

Newble D, Cannon R. A handbook for medical teachers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1994. pp 38–53.

Van Der Vleuten CPM, Dolmans DHJM, Scherpbier AJJA. The need for evidence in education. J of Medical Teacher. 2000;22(3):246-250.

Morton CE, Saleh SN, Smith SF, Hemani A, Ameen A, Bennie TD, et al. Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement? BMC Medical Education. 2016;16:195.

Davidson LK 2009. Educational Innovation in an Undergraduate Medical Course Implementation of a Blended e-Learning, Team-Based Learning Model. A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Education in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Education. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada January, 2009.

Kumar LJ, Voralu K, Pani SP, Sethuraman KR. Predominant Learning styles adopted by AIMST University students in Malaysia. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2009;3(1):37-46.

Ahmed SS, Reddy SG. Preferred Learning Style and Study Characteristics: A Study Among Undergraduate Clinical Medical Students of National Defense University of Malaysia. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2020;32(19):51-60.

Soundariya K, Deepika V, Kalaiselvan G. A study on the learning styles and learning approaches among medical students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;7(10):1020-1025.

Swe KMM, Wen CA, Kumar SJ, Bhardwaj A. Learning Style Preferences of Medical Students in Perdana University-Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland School of Medicine, Malaysia. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research. 2016;18(3):1-8.

Lujan LH, Dicarlo SE. Too much teaching, not enough learning: what is the solution? Advances in Physiology Education. 2006;30:17–22.

Twigg CA. Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review. 2003;38(5):28.

Novelli ELB, Fernandes AAH. Students’ Preferred Teaching Techniques for Biochemistry in Biomedicine and Medicine Courses. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2007;35(4):263–266.

Atif M, Famidha K, Mukarram A, Saima E, Kamran A, Masood AQ. Perception and preferences of undergraduate medical students regarding the use of contemporary teaching aids at Dow international medical college, Karachi. Journal of University of Health Sciences Karachi. 2011;5(1):34–6.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Ahmed, S. S., & Reddy, S. C. (2021). Clinical Medical Students’ Preferred Teaching Methods: A Study at the National Defense University of Malaysia. European Journal of Medical and Health Science, 3(2), 74-78. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2021.3.2.762