The Need for Three Separate Parallel WAD Ratings of Whiplash Injuries to Cervical, Lumbosacral, and Thoracic Spine in Clinical Assessments of Injured Motorists
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Background: The prevailing classification of whiplash associated disorder (WAD) focuses solely on neck injuries, thus implying that injuries to other spinal regions are relatively inconsequential. In fact, some whiplash studies exclude patients with injuries to lower spine. We examined whiplash pain locations of injured motorists and their statistical correlates.
Method: De-identified archival data of 158 injured motorists (57 men and 101 women; mean age 39.4 years, SD=12.5) were reviewed statistically. Their motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) occurred 7 to 194 weeks previously (mean=50.7 weeks, SD=38.5), but all still experienced active whiplash symptoms requiring therapy.
Results: The most frequently reported locations of whiplash pain were the head (89.9%), neck (88.6%), shoulders (80.4%), and lower back (77.8%). WAD studies that exclude patients with lower back pain might exclude about 82.9% of injured motorists: the remaining 17.1% of patients with whiplash injury only to the neck are presumably those less adversely affected by the MVA than patients with pain in multiple locations. No correlations of high or moderate magnitude were detected among the various pain locations. Furthermore, no high or moderate correlations were observed between clinical variables (including 2 neuropsychological symptoms scales) and reports of headache or pain in the neck or in lower back.
Discussion and Conclusions: The prevailing WAD classification system needs to be renamed as specific to neck injury only: WAD-C. Parallel WAD classification systems need to be introduced separately for the lumbosacral spine (as WAD-LS) as well as the thoracic spine (as WAD-T) to improve diagnostic descriptive precision of clinical WAD assessments and of their research applications.
-
Fakharian E, Mohammadzadeh M, Saberi HR, Fazel MR, Rejali M, Akbari H, Mirzadeh AS, Mohammadzadeh J. Spinal injury resulting from car accident: Focus to prevention. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;12(2):180-184. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.152110: 10.4103/1793-5482.152110.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Robertson A, Branfoot T, Barlow IF, Giannoudis PV. Spinal injury patterns resulting from car and motorcycle accidents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(24):2825-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00019.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Freeman MD, Croft AC, Nicodemus CN, Centeno CJ, Elkins WL. Significant spinal injury resulting from low-level accelerations: a case series of roller coaster injuries. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005 Nov;86(11):2126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.05.017.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Fast A, Sosner J, Begeman P, Thomas MA, Chiu T: Lumbar spinal strains associated with whiplash injury: A cadaveric study. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2002;81:645–650.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Cernovsky Z, Mann S, Diamond DM, Persad E, Oyewumi LK, Velamoor V, Mendonça J, Woodbury-Fariña MA, and Husni M. Critical Review of the Content Validity of Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2020;3(2):16-29.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Cernovsky ZZ, Litman LC, Mann SC, Oyewumi LK, Bureau Y, Mendonça JD, Diamond DM, and Raheb H. Validation of the Subjective Neuropsychological Symptoms Scale (SNPSS) in Injured Motorists. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2021;4(1):6-13.
Google Scholar
-
King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NEG, Wade [1] DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. Journal of Neurology. 1995;242:587-592.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Cernovsky ZZ, Mann SC, Velamoor V, Oyewumi LK, Diamond DM, Litman LC. Validation of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) on Patients Injured in High Impact Car Accidents. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2021;4(1):14-22. doi.org/10.22259/2638-5201.0401003.
Google Scholar
-
Cernovsky Z, Istasy P, Bureau Y, Chiu S. Scale for retrospective assessment of immediate concussion symptoms. Mental Illness. 2018;10(2):70-71, and Appendix (2 pages).
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Morin CM, Belleville G, Bélanger L, and Ivers H. The insomnia severity index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011; 34:601-608.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Weathers FW, Litz BT, Keane TM, Palmieri PA, Marx BP, Schnurr PP. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The National Center for PTSD, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, 2013. www.ptsd.va.gov.
Google Scholar
-
Cleeland CS. The Brief Pain Inventory - User Guide. Houston, TX: The University of Texas - M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 2009.
Google Scholar
-
Pinfold M, Niere KR, O'Leary EF, Hoving JL, Green S and Buchbinder R. Validity and internal consistency of a Whiplash-Specific disability measure. Spine. 2004;29(3): 263-268.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine. 1995;20(8 Suppl):1S-73S.
Google Scholar
-
Freeman MD, Croft AC, Rossignol AM. “Whiplash associated disorders: redefining whiplash and its management” by the Quebec Task Force. A critical evaluation. Spine. 1998;23:1043-9.
DOI
Google Scholar
-
Teasell RW, Merskey H. The Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders and the British Columbia Whiplash Initiative: A study of insurance industry initiatives. Pain Research and Management. 1999;4(3):141-9.
DOI
Google Scholar
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Cernovsky, Z. Z., Mann, S. C., Velamoor, V. R., & Oyewumi, L. K. (2021). The Need for Three Separate Parallel WAD Ratings of Whiplash Injuries to Cervical, Lumbosacral, and Thoracic Spine in Clinical Assessments of Injured Motorists. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(1), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2021.3.1.699
