The failure rates of the medical students had increased during the past few years. There are many supportive factors for deteriorating the students’ performance. One of these might be due to some defect in teaching/learning system. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effects of changes in teaching/learning schedule pattern in Physiology Subject among 2nd MB BS students from University of Medicine, Magway. A Comparative study was done. Data was collected from 2nd MBBS students studying at University of Medicine, Magway, Myanmar (n = 230). Class test-1 was done before the introducing of the new teaching/learning schedule pattern. There was 3-month intervention of introducing the new teaching/learning schedule pattern. At the end of this program, class test-2 was done. Scores of all students in class test-1 and class test-2 were compared and analyzed. In the present study, the average marks of class test-1 and class test-2 were 38.23±14.56 and 43.32±18.42, respectively. It was found that the average score of the students in class test-2 was higher than that of class test-1(p< 0.001). Both class test-1 and class test-2 included 2 sections which involved multiple choice questions (MCQs) and multiple short questions (MSQs). In MCQs section, 22.17% of the total students were passed in class test-1 whereas it was increased to 33.48% in class test-2 (p< 0.01). In MSQs section, it was indicated that 29.56% of the total students were passed in class test-1 and 39.56% of the students were passed in class test-2 (p< 0.001). In the average score of both MCQs and MSQs, the students passed rate is increased from 26.96% to 36.96% after the changing of teaching/learning style (p< 0.001).This findings suggested that the new teaching/learning style was more effective than the traditional teaching.
Byers, W. S. & Hedrick. R. E. (1976). A Comparison of Two Teaching Strategies; Lecture vs. Discussion in a Small Class Environment at Florida Southern College. (ERIC Document No. EDI36741).
Mcrae. L. S. & Young. J. D. (1988). Student Satisfaction in Introductory Business Courses Taught by Lecture and Discussion Methods. Journal of Education. Vol.6, pp. 252- 255.
Khee, C.M., Wei, G.W. and Jamaluddin, S.A. (2014) Students’ perception towards lecture capture based on the technology acceptance.
Wike, R.R. (2003) The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human Physiology course for non-majors. Adv Physiol Educ. Vol. 27, pp 207-223.
Costa ML, Van Rensburg L, Rushton N. Does teaching style matter. A randomized trial of group discussion versus lectures in Orthopaedic undergraduate teaching. MedEduc. 2007; 41:214-7.
Iputo, J.E. (2005) Facilitating the integrated small group tutorial in a medical programme-the university of Transkei experience. South African Medical Journal. Vol. 95, pp 959-62.
Tewksbury, B. J. (1995). Specific strategies for using the “jigsaw” technique for working in groups in non-lecture-based courses. Journal of Geological Education, 43, 322-326.
AI-Faleh, S. K. (1992). "Lecture Vs. Discussion in Teaching Biology for Tenth Grade Students in Saudi Arabia" Theses, Dissertations, & Student Scholarship: Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication Department. 84.
Abraham, G. and Madhavikutty, G. (2016) A comparative study on the effectiveness of interactive lecture and tutorial among undergraduate medical students. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research Vol.3 (11), pp 2454-7379.
Randall. J. S. (1978). You and Effective Training Part 5: Methods of Teaching. Training and Development Journal. 32. (10). pp. 8-11.
Jones. A. S. & Bog Ford. L. W. & Wallen. E. A. (1979). Strategies For Teaching.
Handleman. C. (1976). The Lecture Versus The Group of Discussion Method of Teaching The Community College. Commun.
Tomm, K. & Leahey, M. (1980). A Comparison of Three Teaching Methods. Journal of Marital and Family-Therapy. Q., (4), pp,453-458.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.