Introduction: The goal of cephalometric analysis is to determine the skeletal and dental relationships that exist in an individual patient. The objectives of the present study were to establish the Wits appraisal for Qatari females and to compare the results with previous reported results in different racial groups.
Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 34 lateral cephalometric radiographs of Qatari female patients with age range from18 to 25 years old presented with well-balanced face and acceptable profile.
Results: The mean value of the Wits appraisal for Qatari females in the present study was -0.62 ± 3.8. The Wits appraisal mean value of the present study revealed that no statistically significant difference between the Qatari females and the original data of Jacobson. On the other hand, significant differences were found when compared to other populations from several reports.
Conclusion: The Wits appraisal among Qatari females was -0.62 with standard deviation of 3.8. Care should be taken in growing and developing children where variation in dental height exists and may confuse the Wits value. The Wits appraisal could be used as a moderator to ANB angle in boarder line cases. It is recommended to incorporate angular measurements using 3D imaging software which increases diagnostic accuracy for the least amount of existed discrepancy.
Broadbent BA new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod.;51:93-114.1931.
Hofrath H. Bedeutung der röntgenfern und abstands aufnahme fürdie diagnostik der kieferanomalien. Fortschritte der Orthodontie.;1:231-58. 1931.
Downs WB. Variations In Facial Relationship: Their Significance In Treatment and Prognosis1. Angle Orthod.; 19:145-55. 1949.
Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod.;39:729-55. 1953.
Tweed CH. The Frankfort-Mandibular Incisor Angle (FMIA) In Orthodontic Diagnosis, Treatment Planning and Prognosis.Angle Orthod.;24:121-69.1954.
Mills JR. Principles and Practice of Orthodontics. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.1982.
Sassouni V. A roentgenographic cephalometric analysis of cephalo-facio-dental relationships. Am J Orthod. 41:735-64.1955.
Ricketts, R. M. Cephalometric Analysis And Synthesis. Angle Orthod.;67:141-56. 1961.
Jacobson, A. The Wits appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod.;67:125-38. 1975.
McNamara, J. A., Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation." Am J Orthod.;86:449-69.1984.
Riedel RA.The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod.;22:142–45. 1952.
Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod.;29:8–29. 1959.
Ricketts RM. The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod.;30:103–33.1960.
Chang HP. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.;92:117–22, 1987.
Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: Clinical implications. Am J Orthod.;84:133–39. 1983.
Jacobson A. Application of the “Wits” appraisal. Am J Orthod.;70:179–89. 1976.
Jarvinen S. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: A statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.;94:432–35. 1988.
Nanda RS. Growth changes in skeletal–facial profile and their significance in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthod.;59:501–13. 1971.
Jenkins DH. Analysis of orthodontic deformity employing lateral cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod.;41:442–52. 1955.
Robertson NR, Pearson CJ. The wits appraisal of a sample of the South Wales population. Br J Orthod.;7:183-84.1980.
So LY, Davis J, King NM. Wits appraisal in Southern Chinese children. The Angle Orthodontist.;60:43-47. 1990.
Ifesanya Joy Ucheonye, Adeyemi Abigail Tokunbo, Otuyemi Olayinka Donald. The Wits appraisal among a Nigerian sub-population: an assessment of dentalbase geometric factors. Braz J Oral Sc.;12:275-79. 2013.
Al-Barakati SF. The wits appraisal in a Saudi population sample. Saudi Dent J.;14:89-92.2002.
Khalid H. Zawawi. Comparison of Wits appraisal among different ethnic groups. J Orthod Sci.;1:88–91. 2012.
Jagan Nath Sharma .Steiner's cephalometric norms for the Nepalese population. J Orthodont.;38:21-31. 2011.
Al-Jame B, Artun J, Al-Azemi R, Behbehani F, Buhamra S. Lateral cephalometric norms for adolescent Kuwaitis: Hard tissue measurements. Med Princ Pract.;15:91–97. 2006.
Connor AM, Moshiri F. Orthognathic surgery norms for American Black patients. Am J Orthod.;87:119–34.1985.
Rongo, R., D'Antò, V., Bucci, R. Polito, I.. Martina, R. , & Michelotti, A.). Skeletal and dental effects of Class III orthopaedic treatment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Oral Rehab.;44,545–62. 2017.
Woon, S. C., & Thiruvenkatachari, BEarly orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am. J. of Orthod. and Dentofac. Orthoped.;151:28–52. 2017.
Nadia Abou Kheir and Chung How Kau Measuring mandibular asymmetry in Class I normal subjects using 3D novel coordinate system. Ann Maxillofac Surg.;4:34–38. 2014.
Zhou L, Mok C-W, Hägg U, McGrath C, Bendeus M, Wu J. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample. Angle Orthod.;78:1023-29. 2008.
Shendre S, Karan GK, Ravinarayana RPR, Mamtha T. Correlation of the anteroposterior relationships of the dental arch and jaw-base in subjects with class I, class II and class III malocclusions. Int J Contemporary Dent; 2:68-73. 2011.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.