Differences in Cell Death and BMP-2 Expression in Core Biopsy Specimens of Malignant Bone Tumors Given Hydrogen Peroxide Compared to Liquid Nitrogen



Abstract Views
184

Downloads
216

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jun 3, 2023
Published Jul 4, 2023
10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.4.1840

Abstract viewed = 184 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Introduction: Malignant bone tumors have a global prevalence of 1% of the overall malignancy case, with a very low 5-year survival rate and high local recurrence. The limb-salvage surgery with bone recycling is widely developed in the management of malignant bone tumors. Hydrogen peroxide and liquid nitrogen are bone recycling mediator agents destroying the malignant tumor cells while preserving healthy bones as much as possible. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide and liquid nitrogen with the number of tumor cell deaths using the Huvos score and BMP-2 expression in malignant bone tumors.

Materials and Method: In vitro experimental research was performed on 30 core needle biopsy samples of bone malignant tumors divided into 2 groups of hydrogen peroxide and liquid nitrogen. The parameters measured are Huvos score and BMP-2 level.

Results: Based on this study, the characteristics of malignant bone tumors were dominated by primary tumors (83.9%), in female patients (53.3%) with an average age of 30 years. Liquid nitrogen gave better results than hydrogen peroxide, marked by a lower Huvos score (average 12.13 vs. 18.87, p=0.033) and a higher BMP-2 (average 39.53 ± 26.59 vs. 63.87 ± 27.61, p=0.020).

Conclusion: Liquid nitrogen is an effective bone recycling agent for the management of malignant bone tumors.

Keywords: hydrogen peroxide liquid nitrogen limb salvage malignant bone tumor

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Apley, & Solomon. System of orthopaedics and trauma. In Taylor & Francis Group. 2018.
     Google Scholar
  2. Mirabello L, Troisi RJ, Savage SA. Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: Data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. Cancer. 2009.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  3. Ogawa Y, Takahashi T, Kobayashi T, Kariya S, Nishioka A, Mizobuchi H, et al. Mechanism of hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis of the human osteosarcoma cell line HS-Os-1. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2003; 12(4): 459-463.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  4. Rosen G, Marcove RC, Caparros B, Nirenberg A, Kosloff C, Huvos A. Primary osteogenic sarcoma. The rationale for preoperative chemotherapy and delayed surgery. Cancer. 197; 43(6): 2163-2177.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  5. Carreira AC, Lojudice FH, Halcsik E, Navarro RD, Sogayar MC, Granjeiro JM. Bone morphogenetic proteins: Facts, challenges, and future perspectives. Journal of Dental Research. 2014; 93(4): 335-45
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  6. Kamal A. F., Rubiansyah P. Early clinical outcome of limb salvage surgery of osteosarcoma in the lower extremity using liquid nitrogen. Bioscmed. 2022; 6(6): 1875-83
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  7. Feng C, Xu Z, Tang X, Cao H, Zhang G, Tan J. Estrogen-related receptor α: a significant regulator and promising target in bone homeostasis and bone metastasis. Molecules. 2022; 27(13): 3976.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  8. Sadykova LR, Ntekim AI, Muyangwa-Semenova M, Rutland CS, Jeyapalan JN, Blatt N, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of osteosarcoma. Cancer Investigation. 2020; 38(5): 259-269.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  9. Van Mater D, Wagner L. Management of recurrent Ewing sarcoma: challenges and approaches. Onco Targets Ther. 2019; 12: 2279-2288.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  10. Dash A, Das T, Knapp FFR. Targeted radionuclide therapy of painful bone metastases: past developments, current status, recent advances and future directions. Curr Med Chem. 2020; 27(19): 3187-3249.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  11. Chen C, Garlich J, Vincent K, Brien E. Postoperative complications with cryotherapy in bone tumors. J Bone Oncol. 2017; 7: 13-17.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  12. Eka Wiratnaya, Ayu AAI, Yudhi Setiawan IGN, Wien IGNA, Suyasa IK, Kawiyana IKS, et al. Outcome of bone recycling using liquid nitrogen as bone reconstruction procedure in malignant and recurrent benign aggressive bone tumour of distal tibia: A report of four cases. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2017; 25(2): 2309499017713940
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  13. Yamamoto N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K. Effects of liquid nitrogen treatment on the proliferation of osteosarcoma and the biomechanical properties of normal bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2003; 8(3): 374-80.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  14. Nicholson NC, Ramp WK, Kneisl JS, Kaysinger KK. Hydrogen peroxide inhibits giant cell tumor and osteoblast metabolism in vitro. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998; 347: 250-260.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  15. Wang Y, Wang W, Qiu E. Protection of oxidative stress induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells by dihydromyricetin through down-regulation of caspase activation and up-regulation of BcL-2. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2017; 24(4): 837-842.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  16. Chen CM, Chen CF, Wang JY, Madda R, Tsai SW, Wu PK, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein activity preservation with extracorporeal irsarantion-and liquid nitrogen freezing-treated recycled autografts for biological reconstruction in malignant bone tumor. Cryobiology. 2019; 89: 82-89.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  17. Raida M, Clement JH, Leek RD, Ameri K, Bicknell R, Niederwieser D, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and induction of tumor angiogenesis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2005; 131(11): 741-750.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  18. Chen X, Zhang Y. BMP-2 and miR-29c in osteosarcoma tissues on proliferation and invasion of osteosarcoma cells. Oncology letters. 2019; 17(6): 5389-5394.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  19. Garg SK, Aggarwal P, Virk J, Punia RPS, Dimri K, Jindal R. Limb salvage using liquid nitrogen-treated tumour-bearing autograft: a single institutional experience of 10 patients. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2020; 54(2): 200-207.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  20. Hindiskere S, Doddarangappa S, Chinder PS. What are the challenges and complications of sterilizing autografts with liquid nitrogen for malignant bone tumors? A preliminary report. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2020; 478(11): 2505.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  21. Han LJ, Ma F, Wang J, Pan H, Yang J, Zhao G, et al. Targeting endogenous hydrogen peroxide at bone defects promotes bone repair. Advanced Functional Materials. 2022; 32.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  22. DePaula CA, Truncale KG, Gertzman AA, Sunwoo MH, Dunn MG. Effects of hydrogen peroxide cleaning procedures on bone graft osteoinductivity and mechanical properties. Cell and Tissue Banking. 2005; 6(4): 287-298.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)