The Outcome of Utilising Virtual Learning Environment in Anatomy Learning: A Perspective of Preclinical Medicine Students in Edo State University

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Jemima A. Chukwu

  •   Willy B. Vidona

Abstract


Background: In developing countries, utilising virtual technologies for learning purposes is no longer a novelty in revolutionising anatomy education. Whereas, the outcome in a Nigerian population is vaguely defined. This study is aimed at evaluating the preferred virtual devices and resources used for anatomy learning by preclinical students. Also, to assess the benefits and possible challenges faced with using virtual technology in medical education.




Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted which deployed a quantitative and qualitative method in data collection. This study population comprises preclinical medicine students studying at Edo State University, Uzairue, Nigeria during the 2020/2021 academic session. A hard copy questionnaire was designed, reviewed by experts and tested for reliability using Cronbach’s α-coefficient test (= 0.775). Data were analysed using IBM SPSS, version 21. The Chi-square test was used to test for association. Qualitative analysis was done using conventional content analysis.




Result: 118 students (90%) completed the questionnaire with sex size proportion as female students (55.1%), male students (44.9%). The mean age of respondents was 19.72 years. More students used android phones (43.2%) for virtual study. The virtual learning environment (VLE) which students preferred was anatomy application (46.6%), of which 29.6% choose the TeachMe anatomy application. Others preferred online platforms (27.1%), Anatomage (16.1%) and multimedia technology (10.2%). VLE played a significant role in learning anatomy (χ2 (36, N=118) = 188.712, p <0.01) and of the eight challenges highlighted by students, ‘virtual learning consumes data’ had the highest frequency (30.5%). Some examples of what students suggested should be improved in their VLE are; “increase deployment and usage of Anatomage to different areas of anatomy” (17.8%), “Wi-Fi supporting connectivity should be steady” (10.2%), “More virtual technologies should be made available” (10, 8.5%).




Conclusion: Virtual technology was observed to be very beneficial in anatomy education. Virtual learning resources that could be easily installed on android and iPhone were preferred and effectively utilised in learning anatomy.



Keywords: Anatomy learning, medical education, virtual anatomy, virtual learning environment, virtual technology

References

Martin-Gutiérrez J, Mora CE, Añorbe-Díaz B, González-Marrero A. Virtual technologies trends in Education. EURASIA J Math Sci and Tech Ed. 2017; 13(2): 469-486.

Jingjie Z, Xinliang X, Hualin J, Yi D. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Medical Education. 2020; 20: 127.

Daniele S. Teaching Anatomy at the time of COVID-19. Clinical Anatomy. 2020; 1.

Swetha S, Thenmozhi MS. A survey on evaluation of students’ perception in anatomy teaching methodologies. Drug Invention Today. 2019; 13: 63 – 69.

Nagar SK, Ojaswini M, Dharti K, Vipul P, Dimple G, Ajay R. Students’ perception on anatomy teaching methodologies. National Journal of Medical Research. 2012; 2(1): 111-112.

Desalu, ABO. Anatomy road map and prospects in the 21st century. UNIOSUN Press. 2013; 4(2): 14

Owolabi JO, Fabiyi SO, Ogunbiyi OE, Ayorinde FO. Anatomy Education in Nigeria: An Empirical Study of Students’ Knowledge and Perceptions on Training and Prospects Towards Meeting the Country’s Need. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2020; 11: 321 – 334.

Peter AI, Azu OO, Ekandem G, Etuknwa BT, Bassey RB. A survey of attitude of lecturers and students of anatomy towards making anatomy career friendly in Nigeria. Ibom Med J. 2012; 5(1): 39–43.

Paulo Alves, Luísa Miranda, Carlos Morais. The Influence of Virtual Learning Environments in Students' Performance. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2017; 5(3): 517-527.

Cassidy S. Virtual learning environments as mediating factors in student satisfaction with teaching and learning in Higher Education. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. 2016; 5(1): 113- 123.

Hamutoglu NB, Gemikonakli O, Duman I, Kirksekiz A, Kiyici M. Evaluating students’ experiences using a virtual learning environment: satisfaction and preferences. Education Tech Research Dev. 2020; 68: 437-462.

Ravi H, Krishnamoorthy K. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in dental school. Indian J Appl Res. 2016; 6: 84 – 85.

Zargaran A, Turki MA, Bhaskar J, Spiers H, Zargaran D. The role of Technology in Anatomy Teaching: Striking the Right balance. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2020; 11: 259-266.

Kotranza A, Lind DS, Pugh CM, Lok B. Real-time in-situ visual feedback of task performance in mixed environments for learning joint psycho-motor-cognitive tasks. 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Orlando. 2009.

Choi-Lundberg DL, Cuellar WA, Williams AM. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students’ usage and learning outcomes. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2016; 9(6): 545-554.

Barry DS, Marzouk F, Chulak-Oglu K, Bennett D, Tierney P, O’Keeffe GW. Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat Sci. Educ. 2016; 9(1): 90-96.

Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(2): 83–93.

Seun Oyewole. Edo University Iyamho: Model varsity aiming for the top [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 June 10]. Vanguard News. Available from: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/07/edo-university-iyamho-model-varsity-aiming-for-the-top/?amp=1

Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 1932; 22: 140-155.

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951; 16(3): 297-334.

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277-1288.

Singh K, Gaur U, Hall K, Mascoll K, Cohall D, Majumder MAA. Teaching anatomy and dissection in an era of social distancing and remote learning. Advances in Human Biology. 2020; 10(3): 90-94.

Alasmari WA. Medical Students’ Feedback of Applying the Virtual Dissection Table (Anatomage) in Learning Anatomy: A Cross-sectional Descriptive study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2021; 12: 1303-1307.

Strkalj G, Hulme A, El-haddad J, Luo K, Crafford D, Rampe M. Students’ perception and usage of short anatomy videos: A preliminary study. Int J. Morphol. 2018; 36(2): 493-499.

Saxena V, Natarajan P, O’Sullivan PS, Jain S. Effect of the use of instructional anatomy videos on student performance. Anat Sci Educ. 2008; 1: 159-165.

Mahmud W, Hyder O, Butt J, Aftab A. Dissection videos do not improve anatomy examination scores. Anat Sci Educ. 2011; 4: 16-21.

Barbuceanu CD. Visual Teaching - Using Digitalized Material to Engage ESP Students. Revista de Stiinte Politice. 2020; 67: 36-44.

Gangwer T. Visual impact, visual teaching: Using images to strengthen learning, SAGE Publications. 2009: 1-217.

Abbad MM, Albarghouthi. Evaluate Students’ Perceptions of the Virtual Learning Environment at Paisley University. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2011; 6(3): 28-34.

Toth-Gohen S. Computer-assisted instruction as a learning resource for applied anatomy and kinesiology in the occupational therapy curriculum. Am J Occup Ther. 1995; 49: 821-827.

Biasutto SN, Caussa LI, dei Rio LE. Teaching anatomy: Cadavers vs. Computers? Ann Anat. 2006; 188: 187-190.

Karbasi Z, Niakan SR. Application and evaluation of virtual technologies for anatomy education to medical students: A review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020; 34: 163.

Alverson DC, Saiki Jr SM, Kalishman S, Lindberg M, Mennin S, Mines J et al. Medical students learn over distance using virtual reality simulation. Simul Healthc. 2008; 3(1): 10- 15.

Pronk SA, Gorter SL, Van Luijk SJ, Barnhoorn PC, Binkhorst B, Van Mook WNKA. Perception of social media behavior among medical students, residents and medical specialists. Perspect Med Educ. 2021; 10: 215-221.

Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P, Singh H, Patra A. Anatomy education of medical and dental students during COVID-19 pandemic: a reality check. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021; 43: 515-521.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Chukwu, J. A., & Vidona, W. B. (2022). The Outcome of Utilising Virtual Learning Environment in Anatomy Learning: A Perspective of Preclinical Medicine Students in Edo State University. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 4(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.2.1217